Tea-baggers: corporatist/fascist hypocrisy in drag?

I favor the tea-baggers' anti-incumbency stance.

But what I don't understand is why anti-incumbency only applies to government not corporations.

Why doesn't Fox "News" care that Wal-Mart and Exxon and Goldman Sachs and Google and Archer Daniels Midland and... grow faster than government, often -- e.g. TARP -- with taxpayer funded subsidies and protections.

Either anti-incumbency swings both ways, or tea-bagging is the same corporatist/fascist hypocrisy, in drag.