I think this place is full of spies I think they're onto me
Sir, I firmly believe this interloper woman to be a satanic ritual abuser and I have a right to that belief and to interact with her on that belief, legally.
Your honor, I think there's trafficking going on here and I somehow got caught up in it with this Red Chevy Interloper woman and her "family" across the street and now the cops are showing up at my house...
She doesn't own anything here. She doesn't live here. Yet she brings children here, 1117 Garland Street, across from me... Now, she's called the cops on me apparently. She's had two girls, I would say 9-11 over the last two years that, for lack of a better term, have disappeared from view. I have no idea the relationships. I have no idea the sources. I just know she drives a red Chevy truck. I just know it looks horrible to me, from the lines of vehicles I saw last Palm Sunday, for days when I think they had two kids (one a potentially missing girl) in that house, I think. They also seemed to be carrying medical cases or coolers in and out of there at that time.
At that time, I became so upset, I began trying to reason from my front porch with them. There are 3 houses that appear linked in a family tree or family tea. At that time, from the middle house, a younger professional type woman emerged and said: Just go back in the house! The whole thing is so suspicious but I already called the cops about the neighbor behind and that was just as weird and fruitless, so...
At one point I noticed Red Chevy Interloper and her husband(?) came out of the house and stood by the fence, looking very disturbed. I assume they were legal guardians to any children that were inside. Again, just very disturbing because you know strangers are inside that house and you don't know who else is but you know if Red Chevy's there it's always children.
I'm sure the children were there over the alleged Palm Sunday period because I did see them come out and into the house during those days, but not while other strange vehicles were in front of it. I simply see this stuff going back and forth when I try to work on my lawn and my old hotrod truck out front... I just would like to have my life back, frankly.
So, let's just say. She doesn't like me and I don't like her. Did she report me for exposing myself? The cop said I was reported. I'm going to need who, how, when and what, because I didn't.
Indecent Exposure, of butt cheeks?! WOW
If I don't run out of money, YOU go down, this time!
Slithering, slathering, smiling cop, now daddy deals with you in a court of law.
I will see your "indecent exposure" video.
We will compare it, as below...
Then we will deal with the issue of cops making innocent people expose themselves for some perceived violation.
I haven't talked to Greg Bebe of Helena in a long time, but I think I might need to.
He was always talking about class action for what they do to us over there...
There are many pictures you can carry into an arraignment. This is just one of them...
Montana Code Annotated 2023
TITLE 45. CRIMES
CHAPTER 5. OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON
Part 5. Sexual Crimes
Indecent Exposure
45-5-504. Indecent exposure. (1) A person commits the offense of indecent exposure if the person knowingly or purposely exposes the person's genitals or intimate parts by any means, including electronic communication as defined in 45-5-625(5)(a), under circumstances in which the person knows the conduct is likely to cause affront or alarm in order to:
(a) abuse, humiliate, harass, or degrade another; or
(b) arouse or gratify the person's own sexual response or desire or the sexual response or desire of any person.
(2) (a) A person convicted of the offense of indecent exposure shall be fined an amount not to exceed $500 or be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of not more than 6 months, or both.
(b) On a second conviction, the person shall be fined an amount not to exceed $1,000 or be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of not more than 1 year, or both.
(c) On a third or subsequent conviction, the person shall be fined an amount not to exceed $10,000 or be imprisoned in a state prison for a term of not more than 10 years, or both.
(3) (a) A person commits the offense of indecent exposure to a minor if the person commits an offense under subsection (1) and the person knows the conduct will be observed by a person who is under 16 years of age and the offender is more than 4 years older than the victim.
(b) A person convicted of the offense of indecent exposure to a minor shall be fined an amount not to exceed $50,000 or be imprisoned in the state prison for a term of not less than 4 years, unless the judge makes a written finding that there is good cause to impose a term of less than 4 years and imposes a term of less than 4 years, or more than 100 years, or both.
History: En. 94-5-504 by Sec. 1, Ch. 513, L. 1973; R.C.M. 1947, 94-5-504; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 176, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 687, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 550, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 288, L. 1999; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 144, L. 2015.
I'm cited with 45-5-504 (1) (a) in City Court.
Proof of humiliation. That should be a struggle for The State imo...
Abuse, humiliate or harass. OK. Prove it!
Self Gratify. OK. Prove it!
Show me abusing, humiliating or harrassing or self gratifying...
I'm assuming there will be witnesses I can question in order to be convicted of a sex crime?
In order to expose yourself indecently in public you have to be indecent (not), public (not) and you have to expose yourself (not).
Lord, I can't go to jail for having no shorts on sunning face down...
At my private residence...
Treating a documented medical condition (ringworm, me and my cats) when I ran out of sun on my back deck...
Just because someone who could not see me knew I was there and called a cop to sneak up on me and file this charge.
If this were true, no woman could take her bikini top off at the beach to tan her back, face down, no exposure, without being arrested. Her privates are as uncovered as mine in this exact circumstance.
Not saying no one potentially could have spied on me, if they had say wanted to (why?) but what I am saying is NO ONE DID SEE ME until the cop snuck up. That is NOT public or indecent exposure of any kind by any definition I am aware of. Also, it's butt cheeks. No anus. No balls. No penis. (I have to see the video but I'm lying face down.)
If this were true, in essence, you wouldn't be able to change your underwear in the bathroom for fear a cop might have just snuck inside...
E.g. If no one sees me, and I change my underwear on my front porch, have I just committed a crime? I guess if a cop sneaks up while I'm doing it?
IMO: cop was told how and where to trap me and that is all. No one even saw any butt cheeks but the cop that I am aware. Obviously, being a private person, on private property, that was my exact intention, except for the cop and the crazy SRA lady in the red Chevy pickup who does not live here... E.g. her truck is not here (1117) now, but I am (1116).
Your core human right is self ownership. It is the difference between sex and rape. "Nothing is in the truth; everything is in the method [intention]."
All property rights are really only effective as a right to *exclude*
I excluded your right to see my genitals or any "private" parts.
Therefore I did not publicly expose myself in any public way.
What is self gratifying about tanning ringworm on your butt cheeks when your backyard deck time is limited by clouds and you've got a Dr's on the 17th and you're just trying to get better, when, whoops, your least favorite visitor in the world, Red Chevy Interloper, With Children, Who Always Seem To Be Shifting in age and size...
<Show picture of model at beach>
Ask to see documentation of my charged exposure - bodycam
Compare and contrast - expect no difference - just another model at a private beach because he doesn't want to show himself around as much as e.g. the model above...
There's no such thing as "conditional ownership."
I own my body.
The State does not, unless I use it to knowingly and willingly effect a serious "crime."
So this is a property rights case. I have the right for you to know I'm naked, because I didn't expect visitors in front and there you are, warned (this interloper to my hidden lady neighbor is estranged) when I'm on my property AND YOU CAN'T SEE MY PRIVATES. And no one has a right to call a cop to sneak up on me, just because they know said officer might see my buttcheeks if he sneaks up on me. That's entrapment. The End.
I believe my rights are being violated by the State: 3 citations, last 10 years - 3 strip searches... If there's one default move cops go to it's a recording of a strip search...
Thus I request non-retention of whatever images they took of me upon closure of this case.
You are nothing but a piece of shit and useless trash to this system, Mr. Ryder, why don't you get a job?
And Over At The Temple
They Really Pack Them In...
-Joe Strummer, Rock The Casbah
Might be lots of cops, govt workers and contractors around
When the champagne runs thin...
She's a poor man's rich girl and she'll do it for a song
She's a rich man stealer but her favor's good and strong
She's the Robin Hood of highgate
Helps the poor man get along
-Jethro Tull, Cross Eyed Mary
If the person accusing me of this crime is who I think it is she's a liar and I think I can indict her testimony, just based on my own. That and there was no one within 120-150' of me at the time of my sunning my ringworm on my own porch, except for a cop.